Hybrid Apps

A mobile hybrid app is an application for smartphones and tablets, which combines features of native mobile apps and mobile web apps, learn more about the differences between the two in this article on JavaScript frameworks and libraries. We notice the effects of this first and foremost in the comparatively simple and cost-effective development of hybrid apps, as well as in the platform’s ability to run without a mobile operating system. But despite these advantages, there are also some disadvantages.

The biggest advantage of a hybrid app is that it doesn’t depend on its platform. Unlike a native app, which is specially programmed for each operating system, you only need to develop a hybrid application once. Hybrid apps can thus be installed and used on almost all operating systems, including Android, iOS, and Windows phones. This impressive capability has a positive effect on the number of potential users. This also means that developers save time and money when producing their mobile apps. This can prove particularly beneficial to small businesses who don’t have the capacity to develop multiple versions of a native app. A suitable app framework, which is usually free of charge, can make the programming of hybrid apps considerably easier. Well-known frameworks include Ionic, Onsen UI, Intel XDK, React Native and Famous. Unlike many web apps, hybrid apps don’t always require an internet connection. They are designed to run independently offline, rather than on a server, although the user must be online when downloading and updating the app. Another advantage over web apps: hybrid apps can access a lot more native device functions such as camera, microphone, file systems, push notifications, GPS, or motion and location sensors.

Hybrid apps have to admit defeat when it comes to performance, since they are more of a burden on the hardware compared to native apps. This can quickly lead to damage, especially regarding computing-intensive applications. A bad performance affects the app’s speed and animation fluidity, which detracts from the application’s usability. Other areas are also affected, such as response time and touch-screen precision (i.e. the drag-and-drop feature) and the gesture control (i.e. turning the device).

Hybrid apps also lag behind native apps when it comes to a device’s native functions (GPS, camera, etc.). Hybrid apps can access a large amount of the existing features although this varies depending on the device.

Like a native app, a hybrid app always needs to be installed and therefore can’t keep up with a web app that can be easily accessed through a browser. Other shortcomings include the higher cost of programming and the fact that sometimes designs aren’t compatible with the respective operating system. It also lacks the development and debugging tools for a platform.

Naturally, conventional hybrid apps have some weakness that aren’t found in other app formats. When compared to its native counterparts it seems that the problems are mostly lower performance and usability and also the fact that web apps implement automatic updates more easily. But hybrid apps do offer a great number of advantages (especially in terms of platform independence and cost-benefit ratio). This means they have the potential to catch up with their competitors in these areas – and the development is far from over. Thanks to modern app frameworks, hybrid apps can be programmed very easily, and this is making them more and more popular. Whether an application is most suited to a hybrid app, native app, or a web app, is highly dependent on their content and purpose. It’s not always necessary to create an app for mobile content if it makes more sense to display it on a website optimised for mobile devices. Discover which app works best for your project in this article about website apps, responsive sites and mobile sites.